Report on Interest
under logo

FG faults TI on Nigeria’s corruption rating, lists anti-graft measures

By Idowu Abdullahi,

The Federal Government has faulted the Transparency International Corruption Perception Index (TI-CPI) on Nigeria, saying the body’s 2020 rating was not a true reflection of policies being put in place to block all loopholes and end corruption era in Nigeria.

It explained that the global anti-corruption body in its analysis failed to give preference to the President Muhammadu Buhari-led Federal Government several initiatives being employed to purge the country off corruption and reform its civil service.

The apex government noted that since the Buhari administration took over in 2015, the nation’s anti-corruption war had intensified and many loopholes had been blocked which its resultant effects were visible in the amount that returned to government covers through the Treasury Single Account (TSA).

The Minister of Information and Culture, Lai Mohammed, said who bemoaned the TI-CPI, argued that the rating does not truly reflect the great strides by the country in its fight
against corruption.

Through a statement issued in Abuja on Sunday, the minister assured that the country’s anti-corruption agenda, which has placed great emphasis on corruption prevention measures and the building of integrity systems, remains on
course.

Mohammed said the the implementation of the various reforms, especially in the Ease of Doing Business, was expected to yield
positive outcomes in the country’s corruption perception and other relevant assessments in the next 12 to 24 months.

”For instance, following the release of the 2019 TI-Corruption Perception Index, the government initiated reforms to improve on
Nigeria’s Ease of Doing Business indices. This is because we found that up to 40% of the country’s corruption perception survey indices
relates to business processes and general public service delivery processes. Government’s swift action has led to major reforms in the
processes at our ports and business process points,” he said.

In addition to placing more emphasis on corruption prevention measures and building of integrity systems, Mohammed said that high profile corruption cases are currently under investigation and prosecution.

He said that the emphasis on preventive mechanisms was in response to various local and international reviews and evaluation that Nigeria has gone through, including those from the United Nations Convention
Against Corruption (UNCAC) and even from the TI-CPI

”In response to these evaluations, a number of significant policies have been instituted to enhance transparency and accountability, and
prevent corruption. Even in the middle of the COVID-19 pandemic, a number of key transparency and accountability policies were developed
and are currently being implemented,” the Minister said.

He listed such policies as including the launch, by the ICPC, of the National Ethics Policy which addresses integrity issues on all sectors of the polity and is directly linked to a key pillar of the National Anti-Corruption Strategy (NACS), which is Ethical Reorientation; efforts by the Code of Conduct Bureau (CCB) to energize the Code of Conduct for Public Officers (CCPO) and the launch of the Nigerian Port Process Manual (NPPM), which is ultimately aimed at sustaining the
country’s improvement in the Ease of Doing business.

”While we expect the results from these reforms to speak for us in due course, we are also taking measures to improve our data collection and retrieval on these issues to reduce the current under-reporting of
our ongoing corruption reduction measures,” Mohammed added.

He said that having analyzed the 2020 TI-CPI rating for Nigeria, the apex government was interrogating a number of issues and discrepancies that have been observed in the rating process, including some data sources in which Nigeria’s scores have remained flat over
the past 10 years, reflecting no improvement, decline or fluctuation.

”This is very improbable given the nature of behaviour of variables, which are normally influenced by a variety of factors (which is the reason they are called ‘variables’). In this case, the corruption scores would have been affected by changes in the size and structure of the public sector over the past 10 years, changes in policies and personnel and systems over the period including, for instance, process automation, etc. There is therefore a need to verify that there is no
transposition of figures from year to year due to absence of current data,” the minister said

Also, he said, different assessments on the same indicators (for instance corruption in the bureaucracy) by different rating institutions have generated different scores and different rankings across the ranking agencies.

”There is a need to understand why these variations occur, and consequently the robustness of the methodology and validity of data,” Mohammed said, adding that there are missing assessments for Nigeria in the data entries where the country has performed well in
previous CPI calculations, like the African Development Bank Country Policy and
Institutional Assessment.

”There is a need to understand why scores for this assessment have not been recorded for Nigeria for the past two years, which has had
the effect of reducing Nigeria’s cumulative score and ranking relative to countries with those scores included in their CPI for both years,” he said.

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.

%d bloggers like this: